ther Pleiotrophin. or Pleiotrophin. for min or stimulatedwith the agonistmAb or serum. Incubationwith Afatinib Pleiotrophin. or Pleiotrophin. did not induce any detectable ERK activation in comparison with mAb or serum remedies . Moreover in immunoprecipitation experiments no tyrosine phosphorylation of the receptor was detected following Pleiotrophin therapy . Time course experiments from to using either or ng ml of Pleiotrophin. or Pleiotrophin. had been also performed. In all these experiments both Pleiotrophins failed to activate the ERK kinase pathway . Finally both Pleiotrophin. and Pleiotrophin. failed to activate the PI Kinase AKT pathway in comparison with mAb and FCS . Pleiotrophin. and Pleiotrophin.
failed to stimulate ERK activation and to activate ALK in ALK expressing Glioblastoma cells In this analysis we used two Glioblastoma Afatinib cell lines previously reported positive for ALK and a single cell line reported negative for ALK but positive for the receptor tyrosine phosphatase RPTP . In this latter cell line, in contrast to FCS, therapy with our agonist mAbs induced no activation of the ERK pathway . In excellent agreement with published data , the ERK pathway within the ALK positive UMG cells is activated constitutively, and no increase in phosphorylation was observed following therapy with mAb whatever the concentration used . Within the UMG therapy with mAb induced a very weak ERK activation in comparison with that induced with serum . No detectable agonist activity of Pleiotrophins was detected. This weak ERK activation induced by the agonist mAb could result from a weak expression of ALK in this cell line in comparison with the Neuroblastoma SH SYY cell line.
This result thus led us to investigate the degree of expression of ALK within the various cell lines . In agreement with all the data reported by Lu et al. the LN cells did not Lenalidomide express detectable degree of ALK. The UMG cells too as the GM cells indeed expressed ALK but at very low level in comparison with the SH SYY cells. Note that the amounts of ALK found within the UMG cell lines either got from the P. Mischell laboratory or from the ATCC had been very similar. Therefore this cell line indeed expresses very low degree of ALK. Both the kDa and kDa forms of ALK had been present in all the positive cell lines. Therefore, the very weak ERK activity PARP induced by the mAb therapy within the UMG cells most likely resulted from the low degree of expression of ALK in this cell line.
Two hypotheses could possibly be proposed to explain the absence of ALK activation in SH SYY cells treated with all the Pleiotrophins. Either Pleiotrophin. is indeed not a cognate Lenalidomide ligand of this receptor Afatinib or even a cofactor or even a co receptor needed for its activity was absent in these cells but possibly present within the Glioblastoma cells and especially in UMG cells i.e. the cell line in which Pleiotrophin. has been reported to activate ALK .We thus selected stable clones of this latter cell line stably transfected with ALK. A number of clones had been obtained a few of them exhibiting a high expression but clone was selected due to the fact the degree of expression of the receptor was similar to that of the SH SYY cells . We thus investigated in this clone the phosphorylation of the MAP kinases ERK resulting from ALK activation triggered by the Pleiotrophin.
and Pleiotrophin. or stimulated as manage with all the agonist mAb or serum. The degree of ERK activation obtained with Lenalidomide mAb and FCS was similar indicating that the degree of expression of the receptor was indeed essential to achieve a maximal activation of this pathway. Once more, Pleiotrophin. failed to activate the ERK pathway in this cell line . Equivalent outcomes had been obtained with Pleiotrophin To further prove that ERK activation in UMG stable clone cells indeed resulted from ALK activation triggered by the agonist mAb , we took advantage of the availability of antagonist monoclonal antibodies for instance mAb . We previously showed that mAb reduced the basal differentiation of the Pc cells transfected with ALK and both the degree of basal phosphorylation of ALK and the basal activation of ERK in HEK cells stably transfected with this receptor.
Moreover this mAb clearly inhibited the phosphorylation of the receptor and the activation of the ERK kinases induced by the agonist mAbs. Therefore, mAb most likely dimerized and blocked two receptor molecules in a conformational Lenalidomide state in which no trans activation of the tyrosine kinase domain can occur. UMG stable clone cells had been preincubated or not with escalating concentrations of antagonist mAb just before the addition of the agonist mAb or fetal calf serum. ERK activation was analyzed following Western blotting. MAb fully antagonized the agonist activity of mAb but did not inhibit the ERK activation triggered by the serum thus demonstrating that ERK activation triggered by the agonist mAb indeed resulted from ALK activation whereas ERK activation triggered by the serum resulted from entirely various mechanisms . Also note that upon activation either with all the agonist mAb or with all the serum and as previously s
No comments:
Post a Comment