very same clear HuR downregulation. In addition, we put below selection other two breast cancer cell lines with distinct charachteristics from MCF 7 cells: MDA MB 231, triple damaging cells, and SK BR 3, Her2 good Afatinib cells. We obtained a population of MDAMB 231 cells resistant to doxo but not a population of SK BR 3 based on the IC50 values measured. Interestingly, we observed HuR downregulation in MDAMB 231/doxoR but not in SK BR 3/NOdoxoR, suggesting that breast cancer cells downregulate HuR expression only when a deep genetic reprogramming towards pharmacoresistance is taking location and not as a consequence in the mere presence of doxo. Thus, we investigated if HuR downregulation would have an influence on the levels of bound mRNAs and consequently on their corresponding proteins.
We opt for c Myc and SOCS3, as HuR Afatinib targets, and observed their decrease in concomitance to HuR reduction in MCF 7/ doxoR. In addition HuR cellular localization was affected in MCF 7/doxoR because the protein was less readily distributed in the cytoplasm following doxo administration, indicating that alterations in the functionality of those pathways that trigger HuR translocation occurred within this Cyclopamine cell line throughout the insurgence of pharmacoresistance although its expression level remained unchanged. We also investigated the expression degree of topoisomerase 2A, because its downregulation is actually a feasible mechanism of doxo resistance and because it has been quite lately demonstrated that its mRNA is post transcriptionally regulated by HuR.
Indeed, TOP2A protein levels were significantly decreased in MCF 7/DoxoR and MDA MB 231/DoxoR cells with respect to wild type populations but not in SK BR 3/NOdoxoR. Despite the fact that we did not discover TOP2A mRNA in our HuR RIP chip Ribonucleotide experiment, TOP2A dowregulation might be a consequence of HuR dowregulation and explain the loss Cyclopamine of efficacy of doxo. So as to evaluate if HuR loss brought on the acquired resistance to doxo, we reconstituted HuR expression in the drug resistant population. Doxo induced apoptosis, measured by the appearance in the caspase 7, was rescued following 24 h of HuR transfection and in concomitance with HuR overexpression. Finally, to demonstrate the importance of HuR in the acquisition in the resistant phenotype, we measured the toxicity effect of doxo in MCF 7/doxoR transfected with HuR.
As might be observed in Figure 7C the doseresponse curve in the transfected cells nearly overlaps using the curve obtained using the wild type cells, demonstrating the full reconstitution in the toxic effect of doxo. Thus, downregulation of HuR levels and decreased activitation of HuR translocation not just is related towards the acquisition of Afatinib resistance to doxo but the maintenance of this phenotype is also dependent on the presence in the protein. Discussion In this study we investigated the function in the protein HuR throughout the cellular response towards the chemotherapeutic agent doxo, demonstrating its involvement in doxoinduced apoptosis and in the onset of in vitro resistance to this drug in breast cancer cells. We showed that HuR plays a function in modulating gene expression of MCF 7 cells exposed to doxo in a manner equivalent to what is observed following exposure to other DNA damaging agents.
Doxo disrupts the HuR localization equilibrium and hence increases the cytoplasmic concentration of HuR. Indeed, we observed an practically two fold boost in relocalization towards the cytoplasm without having a relevant alter in the general total protein amount. For the duration of HuR relocalization, HuR binds to ARE containing mRNAs. HuR has been proposed to be an anti Cyclopamine apoptotic protein on account of its ability to bind and prolong the stability of anti apototic genes for instance BCL 2 and MCL 1. On the other side, a direct function for HuR in the molecular processes of apoptosis was first demonstrated by Gallouzi et al. where they showed that, in HeLa cells exposed to staurosporine, the downregulation of HuR delays apoptosis.
In this case, HuR plays an active function in the process, mediated by caspase 3 and 7 cleaving of cytosolic HuR that, Afatinib following becoming truncated, assists to promote cell death by binding to pp32. Thus, HuR possibly plays a double function in apoptosis, including an indirect function by positively controlling gene expression of apoptotic genes plus a direct function by helping, at the molecular level, the apoptotic machinery to proceed. In our study we demonstrated that in MCF 7 cells HuR is necessary to permit the apoptotic response induced by doxo. When we silenced this gene the response decreased, but the truncated form of HuR did not appear to be involved in this mechanism because we observed only quite low levels in the truncated type following doxo administration. Thus, to be able to elucidate the function of HuR in regulating Cyclopamine apoptosis or pro survival we utilised a drug, rottlerin, recognized to block HuR phosphorylation. This drug was originally identified as a PKCĪ“ inhibitor but, later on, its mechanism of action was correlated to its mitochondrial uncoupler activity. Lately, it ha
No comments:
Post a Comment